His lawyer, Mr Aaron Lee from Allen & Gledhill, had sought permission for him to leave the country in order to head to London, Boston for medical treatment, Gibraltar and Spain for business.
Ong was due to arrive back in Singapore on Nov 9.
CNA contacted the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC), the police and Ong’s lawyers last week and earlier this week on whether Ong had returned and surrendered his passport to the investigation officer as required.
A spokesperson for Ong declined comment.
The first pre-trial conference for Ong’s case was held in chambers – away from the public and media as is usually the case – on Friday morning before District Judge Chee Min Ping.
Orders were made for the defence to make any representations by Nov 29. If the prosecution receives any representations by that date, they have to reply by Dec 20.
Representations refer to letters sent by the defence to the AGC about criminal investigations or proceedings.
Usually, the defence will set out reasons for their desired outcome of the case, seeking agreement from AGC.
Representations, if successful, can result in lowered charges, dropped charges or in more uncommon outcomes – a dropping of the case altogether.
A second pre-trial conference for Ong was fixed for Jan 3, 2025.
If convicted of the charge under Section 165 of the Penal Code for abetting Iswaran in obtaining valuables, Ong could face a jail term of up to two years, a fine, or both.
If convicted of obstructing justice, the charge under Section 204A, Ong could face a jail term of up to seven years, a fine, or both.
